crime and tort

Coriandra, Sara, Christian and Keoni

Sexual harassment
Refer
Fraud
Illegal
gambling
Vandalism
Bribery
Underage driving
Reckless driving
Speeding
Lying under oath
False advertisement
Illegal use of drugs
MonopolyGun use/attempted murder
Embezzlement
Conspiracy
Trespassing
Running from the police
Standing up in the bed of a truck
Driving on the wrong side of the road

What I think of other peoples blog about The Law

KE0N1 @N6EL MUSIC said...

WOW! I am a believer! most parts of the law is there to protect a certain age. certain group of people. even, certain kind of people. Even laws just for woman. Even laws for just for men. Of course they cater to a certain people. I guess its all a matter of where you are at and does the law affect you? I can see that with the trials that you stated, the laws are corrupt. It not always provide the truth on the subject matter but rather provide LEVERAGE to any parties involved depending on the societies inscentive of the law, the end effect. It provides a starting point for defendant and plantif. A baseline on which we live by. For the most part they are not always corrupt. But I have to agree that some times its just plain wrong. I am one of those who think that laws are made to be broken.

APRIL 23, 2009 10:28 PM

http://websitedivisions.blogspot.com/2009/04/eoc-week-two.html?showComment=1240550880000#c609731639763678073

 

 

KE0N1 @N6EL MUSIC said...

I thnk you hit it just right. Law is essential, no matter what side you are on. The law really does not favor any side. I agree that some are unjust and they are usually the ones that are complex. It also helps us display a certain level of honesty to our government. I also agree that it holds us accountable. However, I disagree in that there are people out there that run away from the law. There has been people out there running away from the law ever since there was law. Many people do misconstrue laws and twist them. I am a firmly believe there are laws out there that maybe passed through certain loop holes and it very well may be kept in place to bring balance to a certain mechanism within the system. Laws are very often made with good intention but not always a good inscentive may come out of it.

April 23, 2009 10:08 PM

 

http://simplytimelessphoto.blogspot.com/2009/04/eoc-week-2-what-i-think-of-law.html#comments

what i think of the law

What do i thnk of the law 

EOC week 2

I think the law is there to govern the lives of people.  It has econimical inscentives.  It is also there to protect people.  They also have loop holes.

Laws govern people in many ways.  Take traffic.  The law states that you cant drive a vehicle on the I215 faster than 65 miles and hour.  You also must STOP when it says you have to stop.

If you violate any of these things in the presence of a law enforcment officer, they have every right to pull you over and write you a ticket.  Each traffic ticket that you have recieved requires a fine or if not a fee to pay or some money to be taken from you in one way or the other.  In any case, if you get a ticket you are losing money.  Money that could have still been your had it not been for the ticket.  That money goes towards the same government that formed the law.  Hence the Economic Inscentive, for the Government that is. 

65 miles an hour on I215 is a speed limit to regulate speeds that are deemed unsafe for regular driver.  Driving over the speed limit is considered dangerous and there for a threat to other drivers.  Regulating the speed on highway reduces dangerous speeds. 

Now coming up to the stop sign and NOT stoping may be dangerous in the same way.  In that proceeding without stopping is dangerous going into coming traffic.

In any one of these situations there are loop holes in which you can still violate the law and the law will not persist.  If you violate these laws with no law enforcment officer there to witness and/or issue a ticket.  The affect is that you are still allowed to commit the violation however you are not getting penalized for it.

What I think of Lawyers

They exist only to defend whatever side they represent, weather it is plaintiff or defendant. They represent as if their side is the most righteous. It doesn’t seem like they choose to make correct moral ethical judgments at all times. They make money through a percentage, more of inscentive. The Idea of them making money at a non-flat rate and more on the % based may cause improper judgments on their part. It would be interesting to see, in the future, if they will work under the government for a hourly rate no more/less.
Lawyers come in handy for representation on something as minor as a traffic citation that needs to be taken care of in court. For example, if you got a traffic citation in another state and the citation requires you to be present on a certain court date. You may then hire a traffic lawyer to represent you. You would be communicating through the lawyer on the status of your traffic citation. If it wasn’t for the lawyer you would probably have to go back at the latter date to represent yourself.
I don’t think most lawyers make the correct moral judgment at all times. It is to their best interest to make money. And they will work harder for you depending on what their inscentive is rather then helping you on what your real problem is. They are experts in their own field and may keep the truth away from their clients depending on what their end compensation will be. They are not always truthful and honest on a situation. They are also highly persuasive because they know how the system works and it is to their own advantage to yield more money off a particular case. I strongly think they may work differently if they worked for you for a flat rate.